On Jan. 11, 2006, plaintiff’s decedent Stanley Stinnett, 49, a maintenance supervisor, died at Memorial Medical Center of Modesto.
On Jan. 6, he fractured ribs in a motorcycle accident and was airlifted to Memorial Medical, where surgeon Tony Tam treated him.
Over the ensuing days, Mr. Stinnett went into respiratory arrest with high acidity and low blood oxygen levels. His stomach became swollen with fluid. Tam decided to allow the fluid buildup to resolve on its own, rather than drain it. Mr. Stinnett later vomited heavily, and nurses drained 2.5 liters of fluid from his stomach before he died.
Mr. Stinnett was supposed to be discharged from the hospital on the day he died. An autopsy determined that the cause of death was heart failure.
Mr. Stinnett’s widow, plaintiff Holly Stinnett, sued Memorial Medical, Tam and his practice group, Modesto Surgical Associates, for medical malpractice.
Memorial Medical settled before trial for $175,000.
Plaintiff pathology expert Michael Fishbein testified that Mr. Stinnett’s death was caused by aspiration of stomach contents, and was not a cardiac death as the autopsy pathologist concluded.
Ms. Stinnett alleged that her husband choked on his vomit, and that he would have survived if the fluid in his stomach had been drained sooner. She claimed that Tam negligently transferred her husband out of the intensive care unit and onto the medical/surgery floor after only 15 hours, and before getting repeat arterial blood gases (ABGs), since his previous studies were abnormal.
Tam and Modesto Surgical argued that it was within the standard of care not to place an NG tube after an ileus was suspected, and that although it would have been preferable to obtain repeat ABGs on the patient before transferring him from the ICU to the floor, the standard of care did not require it.
Ms. Stinnett, 36, sought damages for past and future lost earnings, lost retirement benefits and lost household services. Plaintiff economics expert Phillip Allman opined that her past economic damages were $148,302, and that her future economic damages would be $1,242,093.
Defense economics expert David Weiner opined that Ms. Stinnett’s economic damages were about $500,000 less than his counterpart’s calculation.
jury returned a $7,390,395 verdict for Ms. Stinnett, finding that Tam and Modesto Surgical were negligent.
The jury determined that the total amount of future economic loss not reduced to present cash value was $2,329,979.
Holly Stinnett
$148,302 Personal Injury: past economic
$1,242,093 Personal Injury: future economic (present cash value)
$6,000,000 Personal Injury: noneconomic
The defendant is expected to move to reduce the noneconomic damages award, pursuant to MICRA.