Archive for October, 2007

Woman Blames Prescription Error For Miscarriage

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

A Missouri woman and her husband have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Walgreens, claiming that a prescription error made at one of the company’s pharmacies caused her to suffer a miscarriage.

Drug Confusion

Chanda Givens went to Walgreens to fill a prescription for the prenatal vitamin Materna on March 6, 2007. Instead she received the chemotherapy drug Matulane, which is used to treat Hodgkin’s disease and interferes with cell growth and reproduction.

Miscarriage

Over the next month, Givens suffered “nausea, vomiting, neurologic symptoms, skin rashes, vision changes, dizziness, lightheadedness, chills and shortness of breath.” In early April, she had a miscarriage.

According to the lawsuit, the miscarriage was “a direct and proximate result of the misfill of the prescription for a prenatal vitamin with a potent and toxic chemotherapy drug.” The suit claims that the company failed to adequately train and supervise pharmacy personnel.

The couple is seeking compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $75,000.

Plaintiff Claims Heart Attack Victim Was Misdiagnosed With Sepsis

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

In 2001, plaintiff’s decedent Aurilano Salas, 65, a dump truck driver, became sick while on the job. He went to a Christus Health Southeast Texas facility in Port Arthur, where doctors diagnosed him with sepsis. Eight hours later, he died.The plaintiffs–Silas’ widow, his nine children and his estate–sued Christus Health for negligence and gross negligence, alleging that the doctors misdiagnosed Silas. They contended that he died of a heart attack, and that an autopsy revealed a new clogged artery in his heart. The plaintiffs claimed that they told the doctors that Salas had a heart problem, but the doctors disregarded the information. They argued that doctors failed to properly monitor Salas’s heart condition, and that if they had properly monitored him, he would not have suffered a heart attack.

Christus Health disputed the allegations, insisting that Salas died of sepsis, not a heart attack. Christus Health asserted that Salas’ white blood cell count was below normal, a sign of sepsis, and that the autopsy gave no conclusive proof of a heart attack. Christus Health argued that its doctors performed a cardiac test on Salas, and it was negative. Christus Health also contended that Silas’s treating physician was not its employee, and that the nurses, who were its employees, followed the doctor’s orders. Christus Health also argued that Salas would have died anyway.

The plaintiffs claimed that Salas was a loving father and a hard worker who retired, but went back to work driving a dump truck so he could support his wife, who had liver cancer.

The estate asked for $10,000 in medical bills. Esmeralda Salas, who was married to Salas for 47 years, asked the jury for $300,000, and each of Salas’s children asked for $50,000.

The jury found that the hospital was negligent, awarding the Salas family $1,538,000.

Auriliano Salas, Jr.

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Danny C. Salas

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

David C. Salas

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Esmeralda Salas, II

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Esmerelda Salas

$100,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$343,000 Wrongful Death: Future Loss Of Pecuniary Contribution

$125,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Irene Salas

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Jose Salas, II

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Luis Salas

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Rudy Salas

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Aurilano Salas (decedent)

$10,000 Personal Injury: Past Medical Cost

$10,000 Wrongful Death: Funeral Burial Expense

$500,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

Diana Sepda

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Loss Of Society Companionship

$25,000 Wrongful Death: Past Mental Angiush

The health care system plans to move for JNOV and a new trial.

Fireman’s Death Blamed On Breathing Device, Safety Alert

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

On May 3, 2002, plaintiff’s decedent Derek Martin, 38, a firefighter and member of the search and rescue squad for the St. Louis Fire Department, was wearing a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and personal alert safety system (PASS) while battling a two-story industrial building fire in downtown St. Louis. Martin was one of the 66 firefighters at the five-alarm blaze. The SCBA and PASS-an 2-inch-by-4-inch plastic electric/battery-operated device that rests on the left side of a firefighter’s chest-were both designed and manufactured by Survivair Respirators, Santa Ana, Calif.PASS was designed to sound a loud alarm if a firefighter became immobile for 20 seconds during the course and scope of responding to an emergency call. Martin, who had already been inside the building for several minutes, was outside the building for a manpower assessment review count when it was radioed that firefighter Robert Morrison was down. He was on the burning structure’s second floor. Due to zero visibility in the building, Morrison’s partner lost his way when he went down. While Martin received a 30-minute air tank, two other firefighters went to find Morrison, and then two went along with Martin into the building.

Two minutes after reentering the building, Martin lost his way and radioed Mayday and made seven radio calls for help, after which the transmission went dead. Martin, who was later found near the stairwell to the second floor with his mask and gloves removed, died of smoke inhalation. Morris also perished in the blaze.

Martin’s family sued Survivair and its parent company, Bacou-Dalloz, located outside of Paris on a products liability, claiming design defect. Morrison’s family settled with the defendants in 2006 for a confidential amount.

Plaintiffs’ counsel argued that had Morrison’s PASS unit sounded, Martin, an experienced 11-year firefighter, wouldn’t have gone into the building, since Morrison would have been rescued by other rescue workers already inside the structure. Counsel also contended that Martin’s exhalation valve of his SCBA malfunctioned, preventing him from receiving proper airflow.

Through a court order, plaintiffs’ counsel was able to obtain emails that showed Survivair had known for years from fire departments that the silicone seal of the PASS device allowed water to infiltrate into the electronics compartment, which had a conformal coating, thereby malfunctioning and causing the system to fail to alarm. Counsel was also able bring in about a dozen firefighters from Washington, Alabama, Texas, Georgia and California, who testified that they encountered the same problems with the exhalation valve and PASS alarm, and that Survivair failed to take corrective measures after the departments notified them.

Through testing a PASS exemplar, John Hilleart, the plaintiffs’ metallurgy engineer expert, opined that the PASS device was improperly designed as it allowed water to infiltrate, and that if Morrison’s PASS unit would have sounded, Martin wouldn’t have gone into the building.

Video was shown of David Harrell, electrical engineer expert, testing an exemplar PASS device by placing drops of water on circuits in the electrical circuit board, which caused the apparatus to shut down.

David Schwadd, the plaintiffs’ mechanical engineer, said that from a mechanical standpoint, the apparatus was defective because it wasn’t sealed properly, allowing water to seep into the device.

The subject exhalation valve–a small, round half-inch extended piece of plastic with the hole a little thicker than the tip of a ballpoint pen-was on a spring located on the bottom of the mask which went down to allow exhalation. Plaintiffs’ counsel argued that the fatally designed valve became stuck in the small opening of the valve’s recess, and prevented proper airflow to Martin. Plaintiffs’ counsel argued that to unstick the valve, a small object such as a pen was necessary, which would require Martin to remove his mask and gloves.

By comparing Survivair’s valve to its competitors’ pressurized breathing systems (i.e. an accessible protruding valve on a mask and a secondary exhalation valve adjacent to the primary valve on a mask), Norman Johansen, the plaintiffs’ products engineer expert, said that the defendant’s device was erroneously designed and that a grain of sand could jam the valve. Johansen further opined that Survivair could have resolved the defective valve by installing a piece of plastic, which would only cost a penny, to elongate the valve.

All of the plaintiffs’ experts testified that waterproofing the electrical compartment of the PASS would only cost a few cents.

The defense denied the allegations.

Defense counsel contended that the Survivair PASS device was designed so that if water penetrated the unit, the device would alarm when it was not supposed to alarm, rather than failing to alarm when it should, and that it was only an inconvenience rather than a safety issue.

Upon cross-examination, Hilleart conceded that Morrison’s PASS device was operational before and after the fire. Charles Landy, the defense’s electrical engineering expert, and Clifford Bigelow, the defense’s mechanical engineering expert, both opined that Morrison’s PASS device was fully operational before, during and after the fire. They said that even after the Morrison PASS was dunked in a meter of water for two hours it continued to go into full alarm and stayed in full alarm for an hour and 50 minutes.

Survivair’s president stated that he did not know about the allegations regarding stuck exhalation valves in a dynamic mode (i.e. while fighting a fire) until two weeks before his testimony. Defense counsel contended that the mask’s exhalation valve never stuck while already in use, but only stuck when the apparatus was left dormant and/or sustained buildup from a lack of proper maintenance and cleaning or during initial activation. Bigelow explained to the jury that even if the exhalation valve became stuck, a user could still breathe through the SCBA mask. He opined that even when an exhalation valve that had been purposely glued closed, a user could still inhale and exhale. The defense contended that Martin’s exhalation valve worked both before and after the fire.

The defense relied upon the testimonies of a number of St. Louis firefighters who said that if they found an exhalation valve to be stuck closed, they were able to unstick the valve by blowing hard against the valve. Bigelow also opined that if properly cleaned and maintained, the valve did not stick, and that sticking exhalation valves was an industry-wide problem affecting every manufacturer. Bigelow further opined that the PASS alarm worn by Morrison may have failed to alarm because it sustained extensive heat damage from the fire. Counsel played an audiotape recorded by the St. Louis Fire Department on the night of the accident to the jury in which a PASS device could clearly be heard in the background, which defense identified that of Morrison.

Gary Morris, a fire chief outside of Phoenix, testified that Martin’s death was due to the failure of proper protocol by the responding firefighters and fire department. He said that the St. Louis firefighters failed to ventilate the building by creating an opening in the subject building’s roof; failed to turn off the gas in the building upon arrival. He added that emergency responders did not know where they were supposed to be because of the incident commander’s inadequate command structure, and Martin failed to use the buddy system when he reentered the building. These errors were the sole cause of Martin’s death.

Plaintiffs’ counsel disputed Morris’ testimony, arguing that the buddy system was part of the guidelines, and in the case of life or death, guidelines are not rigid rules to be followed.

Martin’s wife, his mother and his three children, Jordan, Denzel and Kayla, sought damages for his wrongful death. They brought a survival action for the time he suffered before his death.

Raymond Burch, the plaintiffs’ medical examiner, testified that Martin cried for help on several occasions for eight minutes before he died. Plaintiffs’ counsel argued that Martin’s death deeply saddened a close-knit family who attended Sunday school and Bible classes throughout the week, as Martin was a church deacon. His family sought $30 million, the cost of annual sales of the 10,000 SCBA devices shipped at $3,000 per unit, $25 million in compensatory damages and an unspecified amount in punitive damages. Survivair has sold approximately 100,000 SCBA units since 1999.

The jury found that the defendants were 100 percent negligent. It awarded $27 million. From that award, the jury apportioned $15 million, of which $14 million was against Survivair and $1 million was against Bacou-Dallouz for aggravating circumstances (punitive damages) for conscious disregard for safety.

Jury Awards $50 Million In Faulty Water Heater Suit

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

A Baldwin County jury has awarded $50 million to the family of a Daphne man killed when a water heater exploded in his home.

Plaintiffs lawyers argued that the heater exploded because of a faulty valve, while defense attorneys for Milwaukee, Wis.-based A.O. Smith, which built the heater, blamed the blast on a natural gas leak in the garage.

At the time of the blast, Richard Krantz, 55, had gone to check on the natural gas-fueled water heater in his family’s garage on July 1, 2005, because he couldn’t get a warm shower.

Hearing the verdict Thursday, Krantz’s widow, Michelle Krantz, hugged her father, Jack Holton, who had observed the wrongful death trial from the front row. They wept along with their attorneys.

Ken Anselment Jr., a lawyer for A.O. Smith, told the Press-Register for a story Friday he was “absolutely stunned” by the jury’s award and expects an appeal will be filed.

In closing arguments, Krantz lawyer Joseph M. “Buddy” Brown invoked prayer and told jurors that the large verdict would punish the large manufacturing corporation, “catch them and expose them, bring them to their knees.”

“So that you could do to them what David did to Goliath,” he said Wednesday.

On the day the trial began, a plumber who worked on the heater, and Mitchell Homes, which built the Krantz house, settled with the family for $1 million each.

Two of the five original defendants — an A.O. Smith representative and his worker — settled for $1,000 each earlier this week.

Woman Wins $43 Million Medical Lawsuit

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Leg cramps, breast pain and yeast infections.Those were the side effects listed on Arlene Rowatt’s bottle of Premarin, a drug she started using in 1991 to treat menopause symptoms.

But almost a decade later she developed breast cancer, and a chronic fear of doctors and pills.

“I don’t have any faith in the medical profession at all,” said Rowatt, 67, of Incline Village.

Two weeks ago a jury found in favor of Rowatt and two other Nevada women, and issued a $134 million judgment against pharmaceutical giant Wyeth. The $43 million in compensatory and punitive damages the jury awarded Rowatt can’t bring back her health. But, she says it can send a message to any women who may still be on the combination estrogen progesterone pill, now called Prempro.

“What we really wanted to do is tell women if they are taking that drug to stop taking it immediately,” Rowatt said.

From 1990 to 1995, Premarin was the most frequently dispensed prescription drug in the United States, according to court documents from Rowatt’s trail. When it was prescribed to Rowatt, the drug already enjoyed a two-decade long marketing campaign. A key slogan was “start her on, keep her on.”

So Rowatt stayed on the drugs for almost a decade, drugs meant to treat common symptoms of menopause like hot flashes or mood swings. Wyeth marketed the drug as a preventative measure against osteoporosis. It is a claim not backed by medicine, according to court documents.

Before moving to Incline Village from Oregon in 2000, she found a lump in her breast. Rowatt was worried, but didn’t suspect cancer. She already had two cysts removed, and had no risk factors or family history of breast cancer.

The diagnosis was shocking.

“I was somewhat in denial, I could not believe it,” Rowatt said.

She was alone in Incline Village after her moving from Oregon and retiring from 25 years of service in the Army Corps. Rowatt had the cancer removed and went through chemotherapy, but still didn’t know what caused the cancer.

Then one night in 2002 she watched a newscast about a Women’s Health Initiative study - a study that found hormone therapy increased a woman’s risk for breast cancer by 26 percent.

“I learned about it from Tom Brokaw,” Rowatt said. “I was furious that I had to hear it on television.”

By 2004 when she saw an ad from the Las Vegas and Reno-based law firm of White, Meany & Wetherall looking for women who had breast cancer after hormone therapy, she was ready to take action.

The law firm previously won a $14 million lawsuit against the Dow Chemical Co. for faulty breast implants.

“We don’t prosecute frivolous lawsuits, we don’t have the time or inclination to do that,” firm partner Geoffrey White said. “But we like going against large corporations that make bad and defective products that injure people.”

The law firm interviewed more than 1,000 women state-wide who had breast cancer after taking hormone therapy. Rowatt and two other women, Jeraldine Scofield, 75, of Fallon, and Pamela Forrester, 64, of Yerington, were chosen because they were on the drug for a prolonged period of time and didn’t exhibit any risk factors or family history of breast cancer.

The judgment levied against Wyeth on Oct. 11 for Rowatt and the other women is the largest award to date against the New Jersey-based company. It faces about 5,300 similar lawsuits across the country in state and federal courts.

“That’s 5,300 women just like me,” Rowatt said. “I would like to see them (Wyeth) get hurt bad enough that they have to do something about getting that drug off the market.

Wyeth said it would appeal the judgment because of jury confusion while awarding damages.

“This flawed verdict is the result of a trial riddled with errors,” Lawrence V. Stein, Wyeth’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel said in a statement. “The events of last week and the confusion surrounding the jury’s deliberations only confirm our view that this verdict will not survive on appeal.”

Still, White said the verdict was valid and felt it would stand up in the Nevada Supreme Court if it got there.

“All three of our clients would willingly happily give their checks back to Wyeth, every penny plus interest, if they could have their health back,” White said.

Rowatt, who has severe heart problems including two replaced valves and aorta, said she will create a living trust with the money for her three children and eight grandchildren. She also would like to donate some of it to the Susan G. Komen foundation. She also said she would like to travel if her health was up to it.

NYC Police Say 2 dead, 2 Injured In Boating Collision Off Coney Island

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

A 24-foot (7.3-meter) fishing boat collided with a barge and overturned off Coney Island, killing two men and injuring two others, authorities said Sunday.A tugboat, which was navigating the barge through the Ambrose Channel, reported the collision about 11 p.m. Saturday.

One man was rescued by a passing fishing vessel and another was pulled from under the overturned craft by police scuba divers, the police said. Both were listed in stable condition at area hospitals.

Police divers also recovered the bodies of two other men, ages 33 and 51, who were pronounced dead at the scene.

Identification of the victims was delayed pending notification of relatives, a police spokeswoman said. Detective Madelyne Galindo said that all four were from New Jersey.

South Florida Father Saves 1 Year Old From Oncoming SUV

Friday, October 19th, 2007

A 1-year-old girl is recovering in the hospital after her father saved her from an oncoming vehicle. The girl was hurt when her father pushed her out of the way of a sport utility vehicle.When her father pushed her, the girl hit her head on the pavement. She was airlifted to Miami Children’s Hospital.

The father wasn’t injured.

Family Wins $26.5M In Cerebral Palsy Case

Friday, October 19th, 2007

The family of a boy who suffers from severe cerebral palsy because of injuries sustained during birth was recently awarded $26.5 million in damages by a Massachusetts jury. The award is one of the biggest medical malpractice verdicts in the state’s history.

Jose Bejarano, Jr., 10-years-old, is nearly blind, is fed through a tube, and requires around-the-clock care. During the trial, Jose’s father wheeled him into the courtroom so the jury could meet him.

The Family’s Lawsuit

The family’s lawsuit alleged that the two residents attending to Jose’s birth failed to perform a caesarean section when both the baby and mother were experiencing distress.

According to one of the family’s attorneys, Florence A. Carey, Jose was deprived of crucial oxygen when his heart rate began to drop and his mother’s blood pressure rose.

High Risk Pregnancy

Jose’s mother, whose pregnancy was being monitored by the Special OB clinic at Brigham and Women’s University, had a history of high blood pressure and had previously given birth by way of C-section.

“I don’t know why they didn’t do one,” said Carey referring to a C-section. “They allowed it to go on way too long. He was not getting the oxygen he needed because her blood pressure soared.”

The Defense

The two doctors are still employed at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, which defended their employees. In a statement, the hospital said that “the actions of our physicians were appropriate and consistent with our high-quality practice.”

Defense attorney Edward T. Hinchey argued during the trial that Jose’s condition was the result of injuries suffered during pregnancy, not birth.

“It’s a classic case of cerebral palsy, where oftentimes the exact etiology isn’t understood,” Hinchey said.

Verdict for Family

The jury deliberated for two and a half days before delivering a verdict in favor of Jose and his family.

Teens Who Lost Legs In Accident Sue Isuzu

Friday, October 19th, 2007

Two Berthoud High School wrestlers who lost their legs when a schoolmate crashed into them while they were changing a flat tire are suing Isuzu, alleging that a poorly designed Trooper contributed to the crash.Tyler Carron and Nikko Landeros, both 18, are seeking unspecified monetary damages and an order requiring Isuzu to notify motorists of the alleged defect.

Carron was driving Landeros and three other friends home the night of Jan. 15 when he got a flat.

He stopped in the southbound lane of Larimer County Road 17 and parked as far right as possible but was impeded by a large snow bank, the lawsuit states.

The two boys got out of the Trooper and opened the back doors to take out a jack and other tools.

Moments later, a Toyota Land Cruiser driven by Michelle Berra hit them from behind, pinning Carron and Landeros between the two vehicles.

Both boys lost their legs in the accident.

“The 1999 Trooper was defectively and unreasonably dangerous in its design and manufacture as it was designed in a manner that the rear lights, rear reflectors and rear emergency lights were obscured to approaching traffic when the rear doors were opened,” the lawsuit states.

Berra failed to see the Trooper because of its “defective design,” crushing Carron and Landeros between the two vehicles, the lawsuit states.

The “defective design and manufacture” of the Trooper violates Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, the lawsuit states.

“The 1999 Trooper and all Troopers met or exceeded all applicable federal safety standards at the time of manufacture,” said Isuzu spokesman Chip Letzgus. “Other than that, we do not comment on pending litigation.”

He said the company is not aware of any previous litigation raising the light safety issue.

FDA Weighs Safety Of Cold Drugs For Kids

Friday, October 19th, 2007

Cold and cough medicines recently pulled from sale for infants and toddlers shouldn’t be given to children as old as 5, either, pediatricians told government health advisers Thursday.The expert advisers to the Food and Drug Administration began a two-day meeting to consider a petition from the pediatricians that seeks in part a government statement saying the over-the-counter medicines shouldn’t be used in children under 6 because they don’t help them and aren’t safe.

The FDA has yet to act on the petition, in part pending a recommendation expected late Friday from the joint panel of outside experts in pediatrics and nonprescription drugs, said the agency’s Dr. Joel Schiffenbauer.

The meeting opens a week after drug makers pulled from sale oral cough and cold medicines for children under 2. The drug industry maintains the widely used medicines are safe and work but can lead to overdoses when misused in infants.

However the petitioners, including Baltimore city health officials, argue that the medicines not only don’t work in children up to age 6 but that they can be dangerous as well.

“Are there safe and effective therapies for the common cold?” asked panelist Dr. Ruth Parker, an Emory University School of Medicine professor.

“Love. Liquids. That’s what I recommend,” said petitioner Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, Baltimore’s health commissioner and a pediatrician.

While the medicines have been marketed for use in children for decades - ad spending now is roughly $50 million a year - it has long been acknowledged there is negligible or no data from studies in the very young to show they are safe and work. Worse, some studies suggest the medicines are no better than dummy pills in treating cold and cough symptoms in young children, the petitioners said.

“When a treatment is ineffective, its risks - if not zero - always will exceed its benefits,” said Dr. Michael Shannon, a Children’s Hospital Boston pediatrician and Harvard Medical School professor who was another of the petitioners.

The drugs - they include some Dimetapp, Pediacare, Robitussin and Triaminic products - have never been tested in children, which a previous FDA panel noted as long ago as 1972. Drug makers instead have used extrapolated data from studies in adults to come up with dosing recommendations based on a child’s age or size.

While the focus of the petition and the FDA is on children under 6, the joint panel of experts will be asked if there’s evidence that these drugs work in children up to age 12.

The medicines are widely used, with an estimated 95 million packages sold for infant and toddler use each year.

“If these medicines are allegedly not effective or materially unsafe, how is the purchase of millions - hundreds of millions - of doses by parents explained?” asked Dr. George Goldstein, the panel’s nonvoting industry representative.

Dr. Dan Levy, president of the Maryland chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said parents buy the medicines for their children because they want quick results. Earlier, Levy also said parents buy the medications for emotional reasons - out of fear, vulnerability and caring.

The recently pulled medicines had recommended parents “ask a doctor” before giving them to children under 2.

“We all have a lot of friends who call up their pediatricians and the pediatricians tell them to take the drugs,” said panelist Ralph D’Agostino, a Boston University public health and statistics expert.